PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.55%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.50%
Less D&A growth vs. TWLO's 17.47%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-443.23%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-6.63%
Negative yoy SBC while TWLO is 13.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
173.16%
Slight usage while TWLO is negative at -509.49%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
59.37%
AR growth well above TWLO's 16.41%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
281.46%
Some inventory rise while TWLO is negative at -292.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
498.28%
A yoy AP increase while TWLO is negative at -195.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
294.52%
Growth well above TWLO's 363.85%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-247.62%
Negative yoy while TWLO is 57.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.38%
Some CFO growth while TWLO is negative at -312.60%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
6.48%
Some CapEx rise while TWLO is negative at -91.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
62.16%
Some acquisitions while TWLO is negative at -1355.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
24.39%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TWLO's 64.19%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
70.37%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x TWLO's 45.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-91.80%
We reduce yoy other investing while TWLO is 118.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
95.97%
Investing outflow well above TWLO's 66.86%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-87.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TWLO is 53.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -0.74%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.