PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.90%
Positive net income growth while Communication Services median is negative at -2.26%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
12.45%
D&A growth of 12.45% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
112.12%
Deferred tax growth of 112.12% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
12.42%
SBC growth of 12.42% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-650.00%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
2.67%
AR growth of 2.67% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-58.91%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-172.15%
AP shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-71.53%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
75.00%
Growth of 75.00% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-6.94%
Negative CFO growth while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-2.77%
CapEx declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-3768.42%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-14.92%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
284.45%
Proceeds growth of 284.45% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-5500.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
810.19%
Investing flow of 810.19% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
25.76%
Debt repayment growth of 25.76% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.