PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.42%
Negative net income growth while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-8.21%
D&A shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
19.54%
Deferred tax growth of 19.54% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
34.15%
SBC growth of 34.15% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-83.80%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-120.41%
AR shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-100.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
126.87%
AP growth of 126.87% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
146.15%
Growth of 146.15% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
185.52%
Growth of 185.52% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-13.35%
Negative CFO growth while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-39.17%
CapEx declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
57.44%
Acquisition growth of 57.44% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
45.43%
Purchases growth of 45.43% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-42.22%
We liquidate less yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-106.03%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-45.62%
Reduced investing yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
6.01%
Debt repayment growth of 6.01% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.95%
Buyback growth of 44.95% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.