PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.01%
Net income growth of 21.01% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
10.95%
D&A growth of 10.95% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-138.08%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-1.95%
SBC declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-27.74%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-319.32%
AR shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
AP shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
341.98%
Growth of 341.98% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
195.41%
Under 50% of Communication Services median of 0.22% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-4.89%
Negative CFO growth while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-17.15%
CapEx declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-68.42%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-16.39%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
60.04%
Proceeds growth of 60.04% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
89.19%
Growth of 89.19% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-6.50%
Reduced investing yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-14.98%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.49%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.