PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.76%
Negative net income growth while Communication Services median is 5.09%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
6.37%
D&A expands slightly while Communication Services is negative at -0.11%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
60.72%
Deferred tax growth of 60.72% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
4.03%
SBC growth of 4.03% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
117.55%
Working capital of 117.55% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
188.64%
AR growth of 188.64% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-287.21%
AP shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-152.71%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
642.11%
Growth of 642.11% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-0.81%
Negative CFO growth while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
16.50%
CapEx growth of 16.50% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-12.50%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-487.63%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
96.06%
Proceeds growth of 96.06% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-202.86%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-34.95%
Reduced investing yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-2.61%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-152.57%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.