PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.29%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.33%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
10.27%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
16.44%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
10.17%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.47%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
11.04%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.36%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.77%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while BIDU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
6.39%
OCF growth of 6.39% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-18.60%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1223.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 103.99%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
190.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 27.04%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
77.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 12.78%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1430.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 1430.34% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
653.02%
OCF/share CAGR of 653.02% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
125.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 125.05% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
2770.56%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 106.66% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
304.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 106.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
194.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 105.76%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
456.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 372.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
101.78%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 69.04%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
66.56%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 29.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.10%
AR growth well above BIDU's 4.27%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.19%
Positive asset growth while BIDU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.80%
1.25-1.5x BIDU's 3.87%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
0.08%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
6.52%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 12.65%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
12.01%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 0.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.