PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.54%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PINS's 7.06%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.76%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 25.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.44%
EBIT growth below 50% of PINS's 88.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.44%
Operating income growth under 50% of PINS's 88.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
132.84%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 89.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
131.52%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 91.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
132.97%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 91.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-0.06%
Share reduction while PINS is at 23.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.03%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 23.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
OCF growth under 50% of PINS's 115.10%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
15.92%
FCF growth under 50% of PINS's 98.19%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1481.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 20.81%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
404.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 20.81%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
156.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 20.81%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1308.11%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 148.27%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
582.88%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 148.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
164.73%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 148.27%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
2193.71%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
595.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
136.53%
Positive short-term CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
305.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 95.68%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
76.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 95.68%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.13%
AR growth well above PINS's 3.64%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.33%
Positive asset growth while PINS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.96%
Positive BV/share change while PINS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
16.93%
Debt growth far above PINS's 3.41%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
7.03%
We increase R&D while PINS cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-33.24%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.