PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.29%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 0.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.14%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 4.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.33%
Positive growth while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.03%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.52%
R&D growth 50-75% of BIDU's 12.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
16.80%
G&A change of 16.80% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.05%
Marketing expense change of 8.05% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.13%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 5.95%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
9.35%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 5.34%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.33%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.45%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.44%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.69%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-88.75%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 8.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.71%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
26.41%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.17%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.47%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.04%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.36%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.77%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.