PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.44%
Revenue growth 50-75% of BIDU's 40.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
25.75%
Similar cost growth to BIDU's 31.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
21.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BIDU's 43.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.80%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 2.36% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
73.68%
R&D growth above 1.5x BIDU's 24.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
62.75%
G&A change of 62.75% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
41.18%
Marketing expense change of 41.18% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.95%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 18.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
42.27%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 25.37%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
28.57%
Interest expense change of 28.57% while BIDU maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
41.18%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 113.78%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.11%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 58.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.88%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 13.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 55.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.32%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 10.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-180.00%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 4.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.25%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 53.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-18.12%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 9.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.64%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 57.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.00%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 52.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.87%
Net margin decline while BIDU shows 8.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.85%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 55.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.84%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 52.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.