PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.59%
Revenue growth below 50% of BIDU's 22.27%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
12.38%
Cost growth less than half of BIDU's 25.65%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
4.82%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BIDU's 21.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.09%
R&D growth less than half of BIDU's 28.14%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-1.20%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
18.75%
Marketing expense change of 18.75% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.35%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 24.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
10.66%
Total costs growth less than half of BIDU's 25.22%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.11%
Interest expense change of 11.11% while BIDU maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
34.72%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 2999.72%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
6.68%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 27.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.08%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 2.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.72%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 19.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-337.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.01%
Pre-tax income decline while BIDU shows 14.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.40%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 11.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.42%
Net income decline while BIDU shows 15.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.56%
EPS decline while BIDU shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.63%
Diluted EPS decline while BIDU shows 15.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.