PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.91%
Revenue growth below 50% of BIDU's 27.97%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
32.49%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 20.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.61%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BIDU's 31.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.52%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 2.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
360.78%
R&D growth above 1.5x BIDU's 23.10%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
426.14%
G&A change of 426.14% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
146.54%
Marketing expense change of 146.54% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 22.94%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
184.64%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 21.59%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-23.08%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 0.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.36%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-225.46%
EBITDA decline while BIDU shows 32.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-209.92%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 3.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-295.01%
Operating income decline while BIDU shows 34.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-274.26%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 5.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2300.00%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 57.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-300.26%
Pre-tax income decline while BIDU shows 35.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-278.95%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 6.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-443.50%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-176.59%
Net income decline while BIDU shows 47.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.44%
Net margin decline while BIDU shows 14.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.42%
EPS decline while BIDU shows 46.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.42%
Diluted EPS decline while BIDU shows 46.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.12%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-12.12%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 0.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.