PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.01%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
3.77%
Cost growth 50-75% of BIDU's 5.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-11.96%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.35%
R&D reduction while BIDU shows 15.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.15%
G&A change of 1.15% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.18%
Marketing expense change of 5.18% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-150.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.20%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 11.03%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.17%
Total costs growth less than half of BIDU's 7.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 170.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.59%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.61%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
404.65%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
271.99%
Net margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.94%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.