PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
28.22%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 7.10%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-3.16%
Cost reduction while BIDU shows 18.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
38.77%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 0.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.22%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.57%
R&D growth 50-75% of BIDU's 15.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
52.63%
G&A change of 52.63% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
25.32%
Marketing expense change of 25.32% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-63.64%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 213.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.32%
Similar operating expenses growth to BIDU's 26.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
13.44%
Total costs growth 50-75% of BIDU's 22.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-66.67%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 25.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.38%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.76%
EBITDA margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.47%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.19%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 10.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
55.65%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.34%
Pre-tax margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
101.66%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.22%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
23.53%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.19%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.