743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.21%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.91%
Cost reduction while BIDU shows 4.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.58%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.65%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.52%
R&D growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.01%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-28.35%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
10.62%
Marketing expense growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.42%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 5.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.72%
Total costs reduction while BIDU shows 5.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.65%
D&A reduction while BIDU shows 1.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 59.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-4.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.67%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 26.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.88%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.83%
Net margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.05%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.