PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.36%
Similar revenue growth to BIDU's 10.91%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
7.78%
Cost growth 50-75% of BIDU's 15.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
12.06%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 8.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.63%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.63%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
13.11%
G&A change of 13.11% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
12.78%
Marketing expense change of 12.78% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-580.00%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 40.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.52%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 27.10%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.86%
Total costs growth less than half of BIDU's 21.10%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
40.00%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of BIDU's 54.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.88%
Similar D&A growth to BIDU's 7.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
12.30%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.85%
EBITDA margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.61%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.92%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.49%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.02%
Pre-tax margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
24.62%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.91%
Net margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.08%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.00%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.45%
Share count increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.46%
Diluted share increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.