PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.77%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 1.72%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 8.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
32.69%
Positive growth while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.25%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.38%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
7.54%
G&A change of 7.54% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
9.35%
Marketing expense change of 9.35% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
244.12%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 12009.30%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.81%
Operating expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.86%
Total costs growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Interest expense growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.73%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 2980.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
59.54%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 743.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.94%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 741.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
75.46%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 40.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
35.21%
Similar operating margin growth to BIDU's 38.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
88.89%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 4473.69%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
78.56%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 825.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.60%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 809.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
85.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of BIDU's 506.23%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
74.41%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 769.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.34%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 755.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
71.88%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 797.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
74.19%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 794.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.63%
Share count increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.52%
Diluted share increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.