PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.93%
Positive growth while BIDU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.75%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 5.93%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
9.13%
Positive growth while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.18%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.19%
Similar R&D growth to BIDU's 6.03%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
6.31%
G&A change of 6.31% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
2.89%
Marketing expense change of 2.89% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
75.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 197.36%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.61%
Operating expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.39%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.45%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
56.25%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x BIDU's 16.29%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
1.03%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 358.47%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
11.72%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 28.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 37.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.01%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.66%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
135.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 310.29%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.89%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of BIDU's 29.51%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 29.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.01%
Tax expense growth less than half of BIDU's 31.85%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
15.11%
Net income growth 50-75% of BIDU's 28.50%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.27%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 28.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.28%
EPS growth 50-75% of BIDU's 30.49%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
15.49%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of BIDU's 29.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.38%
Share count reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.34%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.