PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.65%
Positive growth while BIDU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.08%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x BIDU's 5.03%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
28.85%
Positive growth while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.55%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.56%
R&D growth less than half of BIDU's 13.70%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
17.58%
G&A change of 17.58% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
20.86%
Marketing expense change of 20.86% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-366.67%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 41.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.13%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.10%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.00%
Interest expense growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.89%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 40.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
39.72%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 1.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.21%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 1.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
46.52%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.61%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-172.34%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 73.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
43.27%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 9.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.03%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 9.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
79.52%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.88%
Similar net income growth to BIDU's 33.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
19.37%
Net margin growth 50-75% of BIDU's 33.41%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
49.40%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 33.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
47.56%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 33.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.24%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.