PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.82%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
10.70%
Cost increase while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-11.45%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.34%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
27.18%
G&A growth less than half of BIDU's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-5.46%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
200.00%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.95%
Operating expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.89%
Total costs growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.64%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x BIDU's 9.92%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
9.28%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.83%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
338.24%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.32%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 1.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.52%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.05%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.29%
Share count reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.20%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.