PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.05%
Revenue growth 50-75% of BIDU's 23.58%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
6.73%
Cost growth less than half of BIDU's 14.61%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
17.62%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of BIDU's 34.40%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.35%
Margin expansion below 50% of BIDU's 8.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.63%
R&D growth less than half of BIDU's 11.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-2.29%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
6.34%
Marketing expense change of 6.34% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-128.57%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 2844.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.86%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of BIDU's 7.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.57%
Total costs growth less than half of BIDU's 11.95%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
35.82%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.29%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
8.49%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 108.08%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
28.31%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 104.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.57%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 69.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
32.28%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 109.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.99%
Operating margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 69.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 349.41%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
31.69%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 128.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.48%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 85.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
72.67%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x BIDU's 39.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
27.17%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 148.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.51%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 101.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.42%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 144.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.92%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 143.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.30%
Share count increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.24%
Diluted share increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.