PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.80%
Similar revenue growth to BIDU's 12.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
17.06%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 11.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
9.85%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of BIDU's 13.56%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.86%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 0.92% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.93%
R&D growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.99%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-16.25%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
4.09%
Marketing expense change of 4.09% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
250.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 557.70%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.81%
Total costs growth less than half of BIDU's 12.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.68%
Interest expense growth less than half of BIDU's 66.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.18%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 190.46%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
14.89%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 67.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.69%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 117.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.38%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 11.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
5.04%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.03%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 468.72%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
16.67%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 81.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.29%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 61.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.94%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 94.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.93%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 80.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.09%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 60.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.90%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 113.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.45%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 113.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.21%
Share count reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 0.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.