PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 0.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
11.26%
Cost increase while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
27.94%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 3.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.86%
Margin expansion 50-75% of BIDU's 3.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-5.02%
R&D reduction while BIDU shows 14.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
27.99%
G&A change of 27.99% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
17.44%
Marketing expense change of 17.44% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-266.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.68%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 4.98%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
7.95%
Total costs growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.67%
Interest expense growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.35%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.21%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.84%
EBITDA margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.54%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 1.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.28%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 1.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.51%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
42.51%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
503.59%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.43%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.03%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 0.38% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.