PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
19.62%
Cost increase while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-11.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.21%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 2.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
14.83%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
10.35%
G&A growth less than half of BIDU's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
16.08%
Marketing expense growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
260.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 731.29%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.49%
Operating expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.96%
Total costs growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.08%
Interest expense growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.25%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.02%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.47%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 42.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.65%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 7.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.36%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 568.79%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-24.82%
Pre-tax income decline while BIDU shows 31.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 47.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.52%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 20.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.85%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 60.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.70%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 81.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.01%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 51.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.36%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 50.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.30%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.30%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.