PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.57%
Revenue growth below 50% of BIDU's 24.23%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
14.89%
Cost growth 50-75% of BIDU's 21.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
9.74%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BIDU's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.75%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 2.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
12.73%
R&D growth 50-75% of BIDU's 22.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
2.51%
G&A change of 2.51% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
16.30%
Marketing expense change of 16.30% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-962.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.29%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 32.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
13.06%
Total costs growth 50-75% of BIDU's 25.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-1.38%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 35.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.96%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.80%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.60%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 18.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.60%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
22.51%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.39%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.33%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.96%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.49%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.36%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 0.34% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.