PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.75%
Revenue growth below 50% of BIDU's 8.59%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.21%
Cost growth 50-75% of BIDU's 18.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
2.65%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 0.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.31%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
21.52%
G&A change of 21.52% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
3.94%
Marketing expense change of 3.94% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
67.39%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 3309.96%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.26%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of BIDU's 11.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.84%
Total costs growth less than half of BIDU's 15.69%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
23.08%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.21%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
7.06%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 333.93%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-0.13%
EBITDA decline while BIDU shows 47.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.74%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 166.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2520.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1129.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.75%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 118.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.89%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 101.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.71%
Tax expense growth less than half of BIDU's 89.04%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.61%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 93.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.03%
Net margin decline while BIDU shows 78.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.14%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 93.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.15%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 94.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.58%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.