PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.22%
Positive growth while BIDU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 9.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
24.84%
Positive growth while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.32%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.45%
R&D growth less than half of BIDU's 15.65%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
3.50%
G&A change of 3.50% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
27.96%
Marketing expense change of 27.96% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
493.33%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.93%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 9.57%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
14.45%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 9.71%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
6.25%
Interest expense growth less than half of BIDU's 19.83%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
10.66%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.32%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.57%
EBITDA margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.27%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.78%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.27%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.83%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.42%
Pre-tax margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.52%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.97%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.73%
Net margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.83%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.23%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.93%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.12%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.