PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.00%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 9.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
17.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 8.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.75%
Similar gross profit growth to BIDU's 9.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-1.12%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 0.77% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
15.91%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x BIDU's 13.63%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
-20.67%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
19.50%
Marketing expense change of 19.50% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
60.61%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.10%
Operating expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.25%
Similar total costs growth to BIDU's 4.13%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
10.61%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of BIDU's 16.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
10.85%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 384.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.94%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 1232.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.41%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 94.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.89%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 124.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.35%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 122.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.85%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of BIDU's 37.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
38.77%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 4186.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.90%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 3844.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
110.45%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x BIDU's 41.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
7.70%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 837.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.84%
Net margin decline while BIDU shows 775.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.24%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 823.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.06%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 797.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.60%
Share count reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of BIDU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.