PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth 50-75% of BIDU's 6.66%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-4.60%
Cost reduction while BIDU shows 1.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
6.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BIDU's 14.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.13%
Margin expansion below 50% of BIDU's 7.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.03%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-58.19%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
0.08%
Marketing expense change of 0.08% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-776.92%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.62%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
17.81%
Interest expense growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.73%
D&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.82%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.23%
EBITDA margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 910.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.73%
Operating margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 847.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-30.10%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
51.68%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.09%
Pre-tax margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.13%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 124.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
132.84%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
122.73%
Net margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
131.52%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
132.97%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.06%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.03%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.