PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.43%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 2.86%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.68%
Cost increase while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
21.34%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 14.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
1.59%
Margin expansion below 50% of BIDU's 11.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.27%
R&D growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.41%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
35.68%
G&A change of 35.68% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
25.25%
Marketing expense change of 25.25% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
264.04%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 93.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
19.42%
Operating expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.79%
Total costs growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.24%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.67%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.06%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 255.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.52%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 191.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.28%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 97.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 92.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
115.97%
Similar other expenses growth to BIDU's 107.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
25.11%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 175.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.75%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 173.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.01%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.65%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 199.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.02%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 196.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.13%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.75%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 199.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.