PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Revenue growth below 50% of BIDU's 15.48%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
10.70%
Cost increase while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
4.06%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BIDU's 64.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.23%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 42.16% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.13%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x BIDU's 8.91%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
0.63%
G&A growth while BIDU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
1.90%
Marketing expense change of 1.90% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
102.31%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of BIDU's 185.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
6.08%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of BIDU's 11.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.43%
Total costs growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.95%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.70%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 349.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
2.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 761.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.84%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 755.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.19%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 933.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.96%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 822.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
625.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 135.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
4.61%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 370.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.71%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 334.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.63%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 517.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.63%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 8629.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 7459.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.81%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 8500.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 8500.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.35%
Share count increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.38%
Diluted share increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.