PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.89%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 8.44%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
9.53%
Cost increase while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
16.27%
Similar gross profit growth to BIDU's 19.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
1.20%
Margin expansion below 50% of BIDU's 10.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.75%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
12.37%
G&A change of 12.37% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-5.53%
Marketing expense reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-983.33%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 491.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.55%
Total costs growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.88%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.35%
D&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
27.01%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 21.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
10.55%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 210.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.83%
Operating income growth 50-75% of BIDU's 68.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
17.35%
Operating margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 55.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-44.64%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 2330.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
32.65%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 275.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.46%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 246.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-69.88%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 32.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
51.53%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 282.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.88%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 252.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
51.10%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 289.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
50.56%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 285.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.50%
Share count increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.56%
Diluted share increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.