PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.75%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 7.19%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
24.23%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 13.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
32.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 2.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.21%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.34%
R&D growth less than half of BIDU's 24.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-10.67%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
22.25%
Marketing expense change of 22.25% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
615.09%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.21%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of BIDU's 16.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
13.90%
Similar total costs growth to BIDU's 14.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-6.85%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 2.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.72%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.32%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.97%
EBITDA margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.89%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.52%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
201.08%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
60.52%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
539.72%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.99%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.36%
Net margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.27%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.17%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.08%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.