PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.77%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-1.52%
Cost reduction while BIDU shows 3.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.97%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
1.44%
G&A growth less than half of BIDU's 2.96%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-13.32%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-63.37%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 4581.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.21%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.29%
Total costs reduction while BIDU shows 0.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.24%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 5.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.85%
D&A change of 5.85% while BIDU maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-8.80%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.17%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 488.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.36%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 4360.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.89%
Pre-tax income decline while BIDU shows 382.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.49%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 418.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.26%
Tax expense growth less than half of BIDU's 49.51%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-15.35%
Net income decline while BIDU shows 395.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.20%
Net margin decline while BIDU shows 433.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.23%
EPS decline while BIDU shows 397.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.95%
Diluted EPS decline while BIDU shows 390.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.42%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.38%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 1.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.