PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.10%
Similar revenue growth to BIDU's 11.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
5.22%
Similar cost growth to BIDU's 5.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
12.54%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of BIDU's 17.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.29%
Margin expansion below 50% of BIDU's 5.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.30%
R&D growth 50-75% of BIDU's 23.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
20.59%
G&A growth while BIDU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
14.63%
Marketing expense change of 14.63% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-75.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
17.07%
Similar operating expenses growth to BIDU's 15.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
12.96%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 10.03%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
2.54%
Similar interest expense growth to BIDU's 2.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
0.71%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.51%
Similar EBITDA growth to BIDU's 9.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-3.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.69%
Operating income growth below 50% of BIDU's 24.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.17%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 11.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.80%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.78%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.63%
Tax expense growth less than half of BIDU's 43.22%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.45%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.88%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.39%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.03%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 3.34% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.