PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.23%
Revenue decline while BIDU shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
6.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-1.85%
Gross profit decline while BIDU shows 2.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.63%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 0.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.61%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
50.61%
G&A change of 50.61% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
9.05%
Marketing expense change of 9.05% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
180.00%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.31%
Similar operating expenses growth to BIDU's 12.49%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
11.23%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 6.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-0.83%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 4.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.45%
D&A growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-13.48%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.30%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-11.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.90%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.80%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.75%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.