PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.07%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 3.66%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.00%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 7.21%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
17.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 0.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.30%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.56%
R&D growth 50-75% of BIDU's 19.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
12.19%
G&A change of 12.19% while BIDU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
23.44%
Marketing expense change of 23.44% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-78.57%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 102.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.62%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.44%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 5.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-15.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.95%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.56%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BIDU's 117.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.29%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 117.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.74%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.03%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.90%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 101.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.24%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 112.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.59%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 111.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
76.37%
Tax expense growth less than half of BIDU's 170.42%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.87%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 110.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.62%
Net margin decline while BIDU shows 109.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.76%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 109.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 109.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.04%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.10%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 1.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.