PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.12%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.40%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-19.84%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.38%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-28.59%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-24.50%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1593.33%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.22%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.07%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.05%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 203.14%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-26.84%
EBITDA decline while BIDU shows 104.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.27%
Operating income decline while BIDU shows 32.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.28%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 54.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
225.42%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.32%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-27.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.34%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.58%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.04%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.