PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.84%
Revenue decline while BIDU shows 9.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
10.09%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 7.26%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-6.91%
Gross profit decline while BIDU shows 12.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.18%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 2.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.52%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
13.29%
G&A growth while BIDU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
5.15%
Marketing expense growth less than half of BIDU's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
83.25%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.95%
Operating expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.75%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.72%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1440.00%
Interest expense growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.90%
D&A change of 9.90% while BIDU maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-24.17%
EBITDA decline while BIDU shows 25.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.23%
Operating income decline while BIDU shows 56.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.52%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 42.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
48.84%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.21%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 3532.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.28%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.60%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.81%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.96%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.