PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.06%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 1.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
45.84%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 4.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.32%
Positive growth while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.55%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-8.84%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
21.01%
Marketing expense change of 21.01% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-897.06%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 138.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
6.71%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x BIDU's 5.38%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
16.85%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BIDU's 4.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-58.44%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 1.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.24%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
70.76%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.13%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 252.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
94.39%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
67.49%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-184.09%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 137.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.28%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 1065.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 1046.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.67%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of BIDU's 38.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.87%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 1472.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.78%
Net margin decline while BIDU shows 1449.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 1423.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.32%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 1407.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.64%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.75%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 0.39% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.