PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.94%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-26.73%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.42%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.20%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 5.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.99%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-6.48%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 110.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-33.45%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.16%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.87%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
71.88%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x BIDU's 8.94%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.23%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 101.22%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-22.52%
EBITDA decline while BIDU shows 34.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.99%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 20.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.72%
Operating income decline while BIDU shows 8.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.96%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 15.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
132.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BIDU's 45.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
18.83%
Similar pre-tax income growth to BIDU's 18.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
33.43%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 26.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
6.82%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.70%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 17.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
37.77%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 24.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.57%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 17.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 17.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-1.93%
Share count reduction while BIDU shows 0.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.67%
Diluted share reduction while BIDU shows 1.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.