PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.11%
Revenue decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.71%
Cost reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.02%
Gross profit decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.20%
Margin change of 1.20% while BIDU shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-5.13%
R&D reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
50.94%
G&A growth less than half of BIDU's 105.68%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-20.52%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.22%
Operating expenses reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.59%
Total costs reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.62%
Interest expense reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.37%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 81.04%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-14.59%
EBITDA decline while BIDU shows 23.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.33%
EBITDA margin decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.19%
Operating income decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.28%
Operating margin decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.71%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 149.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.61%
Pre-tax income decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.15%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.98%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.76%
Net income decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.91%
Net margin decline while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.99%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.63%
Diluted EPS decline while BIDU shows 0.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.82%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.19%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.