PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.18%
Positive growth while BIDU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.06%
Cost increase while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.53%
Growth of 6.53% while BIDU shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-0.60%
Margin decline while BIDU shows 3.01% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.60%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
5.88%
G&A growth while BIDU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
6.12%
Marketing expense growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.74%
Operating expenses growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.01%
Total costs growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.79%
Interest expense growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.79%
D&A growth while BIDU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.76%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.87%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 87.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.45%
Operating income growth 50-75% of BIDU's 10.24%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.25%
Operating margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 13.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-29.04%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.51%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BIDU's 134.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while BIDU shows 141.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.54%
Tax expense reduction while BIDU shows 1278.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.86%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 111.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.57%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 117.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.26%
EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 1534.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.55%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BIDU's 1601.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.43%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.