PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.89%
Positive growth while BIDU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.57%
Positive growth while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.66%
Margin expansion while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.07%
R&D growth while BIDU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-49.02%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
3.71%
Marketing expense change of 3.71% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.22%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.07%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
62.50%
Interest expense growth while BIDU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.72%
D&A growth less than half of BIDU's 121.28%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.07%
Similar EBITDA growth to BIDU's 24.35%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
11.52%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 25.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.86%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.49%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 0.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
82.24%
Other expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 246.95%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
17.98%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of BIDU's 28.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
13.57%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 29.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.04%
Tax expense growth while BIDU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.51%
Net income growth below 50% of BIDU's 39.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.15%
Net margin growth below 50% of BIDU's 40.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.76%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.86%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.38%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.