PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.21%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BIDU's 1.69%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
19.85%
Cost growth above 1.5x BIDU's 9.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
19.06%
Positive growth while BIDU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.97%
R&D growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.78%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-59.14%
G&A reduction while BIDU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
14.81%
Marketing expense change of 14.81% while BIDU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.00%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BIDU's 8.55%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.67%
Similar total costs growth to BIDU's 9.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-24.04%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while BIDU shows 9.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.93%
EBITDA growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
34.67%
Operating income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.97%
Operating margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-60.38%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
32.15%
Pre-tax income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.86%
Pre-tax margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.18%
Tax expense growth less than half of BIDU's 98.89%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
32.83%
Net income growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.43%
Net margin growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.58%
EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.17%
Diluted EPS growth while BIDU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.20%
Share count increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.54%
Diluted share increase while BIDU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.