PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.84%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
10.09%
Cost growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 3.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-6.91%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.52%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x GOOGL's 4.39%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
13.29%
G&A growth while GOOGL reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
5.15%
Marketing expense growth 1.1-1.25x GOOGL's 4.51%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
83.25%
Other expenses growth while GOOGL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.95%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 3.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.75%
Total costs growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 3.43%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1440.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 21.69%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
9.90%
D&A growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 3.77%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-24.17%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
48.84%
Other expenses growth while GOOGL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.21%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-34.28%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.60%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.81%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.96%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.