PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.59%
Revenue growth below 50% of PINS's 16.75%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
12.38%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.82%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 21.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.66%
Margin decline while PINS shows 3.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.09%
Similar R&D growth to PINS's 8.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-1.20%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 20.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
18.75%
Similar marketing expense growth to PINS's 23.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.35%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PINS's 15.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
10.66%
Similar total costs growth to PINS's 12.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
11.11%
Interest expense change of 11.11% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
34.72%
D&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.68%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 104.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.08%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 104.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.72%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 87.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.57%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 89.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-337.50%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 22.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.01%
Pre-tax income decline while PINS shows 1045.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.89%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 909.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.40%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 67.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.42%
Net income decline while PINS shows 334.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.27%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 272.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.56%
EPS decline while PINS shows 334.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.63%
Diluted EPS decline while PINS shows 335.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.