PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.45%
Revenue decline while PINS shows 16.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
12.15%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-11.65%
Gross profit decline while PINS shows 21.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.56%
Margin decline while PINS shows 3.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
23.39%
R&D growth above 1.5x PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
51.72%
G&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 20.11%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
2.58%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PINS's 23.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.69%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PINS's 15.68%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
15.92%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 12.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-18.75%
Interest expense reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.80%
D&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-24.46%
EBITDA decline while PINS shows 104.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.25%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 104.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.35%
Operating income decline while PINS shows 87.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.54%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 89.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
103.57%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 22.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-26.40%
Pre-tax income decline while PINS shows 1045.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.32%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 909.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.43%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 67.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.12%
Net income decline while PINS shows 334.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.44%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 272.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.23%
EPS decline while PINS shows 334.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.23%
Diluted EPS decline while PINS shows 335.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.94%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-16.35%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.