PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.21%
Revenue decline while PINS shows 16.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.91%
Cost reduction while PINS shows 1.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.58%
Gross profit decline while PINS shows 21.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.65%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 3.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.52%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 8.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
-28.35%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 20.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
10.62%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PINS's 23.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.42%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PINS's 15.68%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.72%
Total costs reduction while PINS shows 12.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.65%
D&A reduction while PINS shows 4.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.37%
EBITDA decline while PINS shows 104.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.19%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 104.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.78%
Operating income decline while PINS shows 87.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.62%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 89.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 22.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-4.87%
Pre-tax income decline while PINS shows 1045.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.67%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 909.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.67%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 67.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.88%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.83%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 272.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.05%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 334.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 335.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.