PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.23%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 16.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
15.58%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.23%
Similar gross profit growth to PINS's 21.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.83%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 3.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
82.73%
R&D growth above 1.5x PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
27.41%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 20.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
66.84%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PINS's 23.30%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
204.62%
Other expenses change of 204.62% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
66.40%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 15.68%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
50.50%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PINS's 12.59%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
49.83%
D&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-9.13%
EBITDA decline while PINS shows 104.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.42%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 104.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.33%
Operating income decline while PINS shows 87.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.57%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 89.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
124.59%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 22.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-16.62%
Pre-tax income decline while PINS shows 1045.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.65%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 909.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.08%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 67.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.22%
Net income decline while PINS shows 334.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.66%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 272.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.35%
EPS decline while PINS shows 334.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Diluted EPS decline while PINS shows 335.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.27%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.51%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.