PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.00%
Revenue decline while PINS shows 16.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.15%
Cost growth less than half of PINS's 1.88%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-9.66%
Gross profit decline while PINS shows 21.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.81%
Margin decline while PINS shows 3.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.41%
R&D reduction while PINS shows 8.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-16.97%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 20.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-0.64%
Marketing expense reduction while PINS shows 23.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-104.41%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.28%
Operating expenses reduction while PINS shows 15.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.97%
Total costs reduction while PINS shows 12.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.54%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-9.27%
EBITDA decline while PINS shows 104.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.38%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 104.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.10%
Operating income decline while PINS shows 87.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.72%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 89.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.67%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 22.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.34%
Pre-tax income decline while PINS shows 1045.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.06%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 909.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.69%
Tax expense growth less than half of PINS's 67.40%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-26.87%
Net income decline while PINS shows 334.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.61%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 272.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.00%
EPS decline while PINS shows 334.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.00%
Diluted EPS decline while PINS shows 335.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.84%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.71%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.